Paul Graham recently wrote an excellent essay on independent thinking. A topic I’ve thought a lot about is the key differences between early stage entrepreneurs vs. successful big company managers. They require distinctively different skill sets, the most stark of which is the importance of independent thinking. Having spent 5 years at a corporate behemoth, 2 years consulting for a variety of corporate behemoths, and now 6 years in venture capital, the correlation of independent thinking with success in different kinds of organizations is a fascinating topic.

For large organizations, the importance of large-scale execution and leadership often takes precedence over independent thinking in succeeding within the organization and moving up the ranks. The organization as a whole must move in the same direction. In Paul Graham’s words:

On the other hand, startup founders create companies from scratch and there is no organizational momentum to anchor on. Strong independent thinking is critical as all aspects of the business must be defined and progress must be made on rapid iteration and execution.

Paul Graham lays out three key components to being independent-minded:

In large organizations, questioning the truth and attempting to go against the inertia of the organization is risky and can indeed make the unlikely seem impossible. The overall goals of a large organization are compartmentalized and then compartmentalized some more. Each manager is in charge of the success of a particular component and improving that individual component may not necessarily improve the success of the overall jigsaw puzzle. As I wrote in the past, for those of us in startup-land, a mindset shift is required to understand what moves the needle for a large organization.

In addition to the challenge of resisting inertia, skepticism of previously made decisions also carries a degree of risk in large organizations. All decisions were made at some point by a decision maker and being skeptical about a decision may offend someone, or even worse offend an entire team. The nature of seemingly minor decisions contrasts greatly with a startup where decision making in general is much more agile.

I believe there are plenty of highly curious people in both large and small organizations. Those who choose the entrepreneurial route have a higher risk appetite and likely a higher degree of independent-mindedness that nags at them towards acting on their ideas.

There are plenty of stories of independent thinkers at large corporates who identified massive opportunities based on evolving technologies applied to existing services. The Snowflake founders realized while at Oracle that Oracle’s dominant architecture for databases was not optimal for the needs of the rapidly growing cloud ecosystem. So they left Oracle to start Snowflake and 8 years later Snowflake is a $85B public company.

Similarly, Matt Daly and Philip Lorenzo were working on LiDAR based 3D scanning and Building Information Modeling (BIM) at FARO Technologies and McCarthy Building Group, respectively. When they saw that LiDAR isn’t yet practical for daily production tracking purposes and BIM doesn’t yet have the level of development (LOD) and ecosystem-wide penetration, they went against the grain to take a different approach. Matt and Philip started StructionSite based on the conviction that computer vision technology had advanced to the point where images from off-the-shelf cameras could provide the information needed for construction site managers to easily track production daily.

Successful entrepreneurs must be independent thinkers to start and grow a company from scratch against all odds. As the company scales, entrepreneurs must learn to create equilibrium between independent thinkers and managers who are more proficient at large scale execution.

--

--

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store